The operational flow of an agentic system follows an iterative cycle of sensing, planning and acting.
Sense
The process begins when the agent gathers data from its environment. For example, a customer service agent receives a support ticket containing unstructured text.
> Read More | Unstructured data management: Unlocking business value
Plan
The agent uses its reasoning layer to analyze the ticket and formulate a strategy for resolution. For well-defined problems, this can involve creating a complete execution plan with a sequence of sub-tasks, such as identifying the product issue and then searching the knowledge base.
Alternatively, to allow for greater autonomy and flexibility, the agent may focus only on determining the single next best action. After executing that step, it senses the outcome and re-evaluates its plan, adapting its approach based on the new information it receives.
Act
Next, the agent executes the plan using its tools. This process is often governed by modern frameworks like the Model Context Protocol (MCP), which enables the agent to select the right tool and correctly structure its command. For example, it might call a database API to search the knowledge base, then use its text generation capability to draft a reply.
Reflect and iterate
The cycle does not end with action. The agent can then reflect on the outcome. If the knowledge base search returns no results, it can adapt its plan — perhaps by rephrasing the query or deciding to escalate to a human. This iterative loop is what makes the architecture truly agentic.
Agentic vs. nonagentic architecture: From static responses to dynamic action
The distinction between agentic and non-agentic systems lies in their fundamental design and capabilities. A nonagentic architecture enables a linear, "single-shot" process where an input is given to an LLM and a static output is generated. It is suitable for known, well-defined tasks but cannot perform multi-step actions without being reprompted for each step.
The key limitation is its lack of autonomy. While feedback loops can be engineered to create more complex workflows, this results in a sophisticated process, not an autonomous entity. The system lacks the agency to adapt or be flexible, and its performance will always be limited by how that process was originally modeled.
In contrast, an agentic architecture supports an autonomous process. The agent can make multiple decisions, use various tools, and self-correct within a single request to achieve a complex goal, making it essential for dynamic tasks like workflow automation or interactive problem-solving.
> Read more | AI agents vs AI assistants vs agentic AI