How agentic workflows differ from traditional automation
Traditional automation is typically rule-based, linear and deterministic. It follows a predefined sequence of steps and struggles to handle unexpected situations, allowing only for a limited use of unstructured data.
In contrast, agentic workflows are dynamic, adaptive and goal-oriented. They are designed to handle complexity, make decisions and adjust their actions based on real-time data and context, making them far more powerful and flexible.
Nonagentic AI vs. agentic AI workflows
Simply using an AI model does not make a workflow agentic. A nonagentic AI workflow often involves a single, static call to a large language model (LLM) for a specific task, like summarizing text. The process is linear: Input is sent to a prompt and an output is generated.
An agentic AI workflow is an iterative process. An agent can plan, use tools and reflect on results to achieve a broader goal. It operates in a loop of continuous assessment and action, rather than a straight line.
> Read more | Are you AI-ready?
Agentic workflows vs. agentic architectures
While often used interchangeably, these terms have a distinct meaning.
An agentic workflow refers to the series of steps an agent takes to achieve a goal.
An agentic architecture is the underlying technical framework that enables the workflow. It includes the agent itself, the tools it can use and the systems for memory and reasoning.
> Read more | AI agents vs AI assistants and agentic AI